Dirty on process for ‘clean energy’
An extremely alarming development has occurred in the attempts by the Victorian government to prop up the so-called ‘clean energy’ sector. A planning scheme amendment (VC261) has been introduced that now gives the Victorian Minister for Planning...
An extremely alarming development has occurred in the attempts by the Victorian government to prop up the so-called ‘clean energy’ sector.
A planning scheme amendment (VC261) has been introduced that now gives the Victorian Minister for Planning the opportunity to call-in ‘clean-energy’ projects, with very little valid public consultation.
Unreliable off-stream energy proposals that have the potential to undermine the economics of base-load power have been given undue assistance by VC261.
Under VC261 there is little requirement for a rigorous assessment process, using the best available science and with full community-confidence and integrity, assessing the environmental impacts of a proposal.
There is little requirement, in line with established best practice, for public participation in environmental decision making - at every stage of the process.
The option of assessment by public inquiry would be removed by a ministerial call-in; and it should remain, because it is suitable for particularly controversial or complex projects.
The powers in Amendment VC261 create an alternative back-door approval pathway, which could be subject to inappropriate political influence and corruption.
Worryingly, once a decision is called-in by the Minister, there may no longer be requirements for the proposal not to have unacceptable impacts.
Locally, fortunately the Gelliondale Wind Farm proposal requires federal government approval, and is at a ‘Guidelines Issued for a Public Environment Report’ phase, with the opportunity for public comment.
This is an absolute contradiction to the Victorian government process now in place.
Maurice Schinkel, Cowes